Triple

T9577153
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kanwar Yatra E231072 entity
Predicate associatedVow P89916 FINISHED
Object observing abstinence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: observing abstinence | Statement: [Kanwar Yatra, associatedVow, observing abstinence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedVow
Context triple: [Kanwar Yatra, associatedVow, observing abstinence]
  • A. associatedVice
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to or connected with a particular vice, wrongdoing, or morally negative behavior of another entity.
  • B. associatedWithVerb
    Indicates that one entity is connected or linked to another through some verb-based relationship or action.
  • C. associatedSingle
    Indicates a one-to-one association where an entity is linked to exactly one corresponding related entity.
  • D. associatedWithSee
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is contextually or functionally linked to another through the act or concept of seeing or visual observation.
  • E. associatedMOS
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to or paired with a specific Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) code or role.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca848091c48190bc313d6620d09555 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd99ad7d108190a0b8c975351ea727 completed April 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ccd59fd7408190b36831902e3f37f7 completed April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ccd93e90048190a2b0d7c5c195ba98 completed April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:05 p.m.