Triple
T9543653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cuban polyclinics |
E230224
|
entity |
| Predicate | planningBasis |
P89710
|
FINISHED |
| Object | geographically defined catchment areas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geographically defined catchment areas | Statement: [Cuban polyclinics, planningBasis, geographically defined catchment areas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: planningBasis Context triple: [Cuban polyclinics, planningBasis, geographically defined catchment areas]
-
A.
planning
Indicates that an entity is engaged in organizing or devising a future action, event, or course of behavior involving another entity or entities.
-
B.
plannedUnder
Indicates that one entity has been scheduled, organized, or arranged to occur within the scope, authority, or framework of another entity.
-
C.
plannedVia
Indicates that something is arranged, organized, or scheduled by means of a particular method, process, or intermediary.
-
D.
plannedWith
Indicates that an entity created or arranged a plan in collaboration or coordination with another entity.
-
E.
planned
Indicates that an entity has intentionally arranged or scheduled another entity or event to occur in the future.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847c70b8819088a0a0bad64a50d6 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98ebd4148190b71b134d7545fe35 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ccd58bd21881908b860e3ee469af13 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:21 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ccd93e90048190a2b0d7c5c195ba98 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:01 p.m.