Triple
T9532817
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alpha architecture |
E229935
|
entity |
| Predicate | cacheSupport |
P9924
|
FINISHED |
| Object | on-chip caches |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on-chip caches | Statement: [Alpha architecture, cacheSupport, on-chip caches]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cacheSupport Context triple: [Alpha architecture, cacheSupport, on-chip caches]
-
A.
supportsDynamicCaching
Indicates that an entity is capable of enabling or handling caching behavior that can change or be configured dynamically at runtime.
-
B.
cacheType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of cache associated with an entity or operation.
-
C.
caches
Indicates that one entity stores data or resources so they can be quickly retrieved for future use by another entity or process.
-
D.
cacheWritePolicy
Indicates how data is written to and updated in a cache relative to the underlying storage (e.g., write-through, write-back, or write-around behavior).
-
E.
L2Cache
Indicates that one entity functions as a level-2 cache for another, storing intermediate data or results to speed up repeated access or computation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8479934c81908006d0e6e970ae05 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd98b5651881908241b040f123c6a8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca56c44f88190a54a5d2a133bb07e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8 p.m.