Triple
T952988
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alvin Karpis |
E20562
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCrime |
P7957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | kidnapping of William Hamm Jr. |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: kidnapping of William Hamm Jr. | Statement: [Alvin Karpis, notableCrime, kidnapping of William Hamm Jr.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCrime Context triple: [Alvin Karpis, notableCrime, kidnapping of William Hamm Jr.]
-
A.
committedCrime
Indicates that an entity has carried out or been responsible for a criminal act or offense.
-
B.
crimeType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of the crime associated with an event or entity.
-
C.
notablePrisoner
Indicates that a person is recognized as a significant or noteworthy inmate of a particular prison or detention facility.
-
D.
crimeListedInArticleIII
Indicates that a particular crime is one of the offenses expressly mentioned in Article III of the relevant constitution or legal document.
-
E.
notableProsecutor
Indicates that the person served as a prosecutor in a way that is widely recognized as significant or noteworthy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493b0f2fc81908cd227480a5356a1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b3d8f2e0819097554a301f8aa70f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2a045308190ab94f3adab40db8d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.