Triple

T9518479
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Peter P. Peters E229583 entity
Predicate hasFictionalProfession P34569 FINISHED
Object dancer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dancer | Statement: [Peter P. Peters, hasFictionalProfession, dancer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalProfession
Context triple: [Peter P. Peters, hasFictionalProfession, dancer]
  • A. fictionalOccupation chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the imaginary or narrative-based job, role, or profession attributed to another entity within a fictional context.
  • B. hasFictionalRole
    Indicates that an entity plays or is assigned a specific role within a fictional work or narrative.
  • C. hasFictionalWork
    Indicates that one entity is the creator, owner, or source of a fictional work associated with another entity.
  • D. hasFictionalPerformer
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a performer who is a fictional or imaginary character rather than a real person.
  • E. hasFictionalProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a property, attribute, or characteristic that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847870a881909d8d751a7d29da39 completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd9881e0f081909a0177cedc2e8b95 completed April 1, 2026, 10:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca56a3d088190bdc16670678fb6c6 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:59 p.m.