Triple
T9493961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nereids |
E228958
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAlsoRepresent |
P37164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dangerous aspects of the sea |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dangerous aspects of the sea | Statement: [Nereids, canAlsoRepresent, dangerous aspects of the sea]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAlsoRepresent Context triple: [Nereids, canAlsoRepresent, dangerous aspects of the sea]
-
A.
canRepresent
Indicates that one entity is capable of serving as a valid stand-in, proxy, or expression for another entity in a given context.
-
B.
canAlsoIndicate
chosen
Indicates that something may additionally signify, represent, or serve as another meaning or function beyond its primary one.
-
C.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
-
D.
areRepresentedBy
Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, proxy, or stand-in for another entity.
-
E.
canIndicate
Indicates that one entity has the potential or capacity to serve as a sign, signal, or evidence of another entity or condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847424f081908180305555139f7a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd95e8c8908190950e1130f9612823 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.