Triple

T9492228
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mexican conservative party E228917 entity
Predicate viewedConstitutionalism P88922 FINISHED
Object preference for centralist constitutions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preference for centralist constitutions | Statement: [Mexican conservative party, viewedConstitutionalism, preference for centralist constitutions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewedConstitutionalism
Context triple: [Mexican conservative party, viewedConstitutionalism, preference for centralist constitutions]
  • A. constitutions
    Indicates that one entity formally establishes, composes, or makes up the essential structure or legal foundation of another entity.
  • B. hasConstitutionalReview
    Indicates that an authority or body has the power to examine and judge the conformity of laws or actions with a constitution.
  • C. constitutionalSubjectHeading
    Indicates that an entity serves as the main constitutional topic or subject focus of another entity (such as a document, case, or discussion).
  • D. hasConstitutionalDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, based on, or governed by a particular constitutional doctrine or set of constitutional principles.
  • E. previousConstitution
    Indicates that one constitution temporally precedes and was in force before another constitution in a given legal or political system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca847424f081908180305555139f7a completed March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cd80ca26bc819084add20027aea4a5 completed April 1, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 completed April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cca8c6b0f081908334d6c7cf80e03c completed April 1, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.