Triple
T9492045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gouais Blanc × Pinot Noir (disputed/uncertain) |
E228913
|
entity |
| Predicate | isHypothesisIn |
P50642
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ampelography |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ampelography | Statement: [Gouais Blanc × Pinot Noir (disputed/uncertain), isHypothesisIn, ampelography]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isHypothesisIn Context triple: [Gouais Blanc × Pinot Noir (disputed/uncertain), isHypothesisIn, ampelography]
-
A.
proposesHypothesis
Indicates that one entity puts forward a tentative explanation or hypothesis for consideration regarding another entity or phenomenon.
-
B.
hasNullHypothesis
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or defined in terms of, a specific null hypothesis in a statistical or experimental context.
-
C.
functionHypothesis
Indicates that an entity is proposed or assumed to serve as a function or functional explanation for another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
hasAlternativeHypothesis
Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity that serves as a different or competing hypothesis to explain the same phenomenon or data.
-
E.
isAssumedIn
chosen
Indicates that something is taken for granted or presumed to hold within a particular context, without requiring explicit proof or verification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca847424f081908180305555139f7a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd80ca26bc819084add20027aea4a5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca5651a588190a3cfebe249a223e5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:56 p.m.