Triple
T9480622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Banswara State |
E228625
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dungarpur State |
E232589
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dungarpur State | Statement: [Banswara State, borderedBy, Dungarpur State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dungarpur State Context triple: [Banswara State, borderedBy, Dungarpur State]
-
A.
Dungarpur State
chosen
Dungarpur State was a princely state in western India, historically ruled by Rajput chiefs and later integrated into the modern state of Rajasthan.
-
B.
Banswara State
Banswara State was a princely state in what is now Rajasthan, India, historically ruled by Rajput chiefs and later integrated into the Indian Union after independence.
-
C.
Sirohi State
Sirohi State was a princely state in western India, ruled by Rajput chiefs and later integrated into the Indian Union after independence.
-
D.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
-
E.
Alirajpur State
Alirajpur State was a former princely state in colonial India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and ruled by local Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84730a5081908de282651019bf2f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd8018645c8190823d82a93635b345 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d12cfebb6c8190af3296c7bfd8b3e4 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:54 p.m.