Triple
T9467738
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fund speech |
E228314
|
entity |
| Predicate | accusationsAddressed |
P88280
|
FINISHED |
| Object | secret political expense fund |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: secret political expense fund | Statement: [Fund speech, accusationsAddressed, secret political expense fund]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accusationsAddressed Context triple: [Fund speech, accusationsAddressed, secret political expense fund]
-
A.
reactionToAccusation
Indicates how an entity responds or behaves when confronted with an accusation made by another entity.
-
B.
accusationType
Indicates the specific category or nature of an accusation made by one party against another.
-
C.
hasAllegationsOf
Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
-
D.
contemporaryAccusation
Indicates that one entity is accusing another of something during the same time period or in the present era.
-
E.
accusedIn
Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca846fee388190a6ec273fd644b88b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd7fdd7d048190930a15cb2a2d99ea |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca55f01b081908dc0f12eaa45f832 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cca89d0f0c8190b4528990fe708fca |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:09 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:53 p.m.