Triple
T9460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Universities Research Association |
E190
|
entity |
| Predicate | composition |
P87
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consortium of universities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consortium of universities | Statement: [Universities Research Association, composition, consortium of universities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: composition Context triple: [Universities Research Association, composition, consortium of universities]
-
A.
format
Indicates the specific arrangement, structure, or presentation style in which something is organized or expressed.
-
B.
category
chosen
Indicates that one entity is classified as a member or type within the grouping or class defined by another entity.
-
C.
context
Indicates that one entity provides the surrounding circumstances, setting, or background within which another entity, event, or statement occurs or is interpreted.
-
D.
complements
Indicates that one entity enhances, completes, or improves another by providing qualities or functions that fit well together.
-
E.
theme
Indicates the entity that is the primary participant or content affected or characterized by an action, event, or state.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23bb612708190b09f25385e4b63d1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a240b249788190af8dbf7e80e9c91b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe52ec48190a4d24101c91434ed |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 12:54 a.m.