Triple
T9427
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Man-Computer Symbiosis |
E189
|
entity |
| Predicate | anticipates |
P786
|
FINISHED |
| Object | networked computing environments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: networked computing environments | Statement: [Man-Computer Symbiosis, anticipates, networked computing environments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: anticipates Context triple: [Man-Computer Symbiosis, anticipates, networked computing environments]
-
A.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
B.
analyzes
Indicates that one entity systematically examines or evaluates another entity to understand its nature, structure, or components.
-
C.
advises
Indicates that one entity provides guidance, recommendations, or counsel to another entity.
-
D.
allows
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
E.
envisionedAs
Indicates that one entity is mentally pictured, imagined, or conceived in terms of another entity or role.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23bb612708190b09f25385e4b63d1 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a240b249788190af8dbf7e80e9c91b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe52ec48190a4d24101c91434ed |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a240b1551c81908abcae128ea45d00 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 12:54 a.m.