Triple
T9401140
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaels |
E226474
|
entity |
| Predicate | useWritingSystem |
P26603
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Latin alphabet |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin alphabet | Statement: [Gaels, useWritingSystem, Latin alphabet]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useWritingSystem Context triple: [Gaels, useWritingSystem, Latin alphabet]
-
A.
writingSystemUsedIn
chosen
Indicates that a particular writing system is employed for written communication within a given language, region, or context.
-
B.
writingSystem
Indicates that one entity is the script or system of written symbols used to represent the language or content of another entity.
-
C.
writingSystemCreator
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of the writing system used by another entity.
-
D.
writingSystemDevelopedFor
Indicates that a particular writing system was created or adapted specifically to be used for a given language, community, or purpose.
-
E.
writingSystemFound
Indicates that a particular writing system is present, attested, or used in association with a given entity (such as a language, region, or community).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca843170f88190800a8ab2b5fc568e |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cd5157d66c819094c18f680c7093f7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cca545b2448190a4297312e39c21ac |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:46 p.m.