Triple

T932267
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mr. Tambourine Man E20118 entity
Predicate hasNotableCover P20178 FINISHED
Object The Byrds version of Mr. Tambourine Man LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Byrds version of Mr. Tambourine Man | Statement: [Mr. Tambourine Man, hasNotableCover, The Byrds version of Mr. Tambourine Man]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableCover
Context triple: [Mr. Tambourine Man, hasNotableCover, The Byrds version of Mr. Tambourine Man]
  • A. notableCover chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a particularly well-known or significant cover version or adaptation of another entity.
  • B. hasCoverType
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific type or category of cover.
  • C. hasNotableFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
  • D. hasCoverArtFeaturing
    Indicates that one entity’s cover art visually features or depicts another entity.
  • E. hasCoverName
    Indicates that one entity uses or is known by an alternative, often secret or assumed, name in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493af3dc48190adb7263e6e445ea1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b3bcad2481908b83575b2fb80d14 completed March 1, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b299c4d881908a57ac2711676cd7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.