Triple
T9212752
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aru Islands |
E221165
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dobel language |
E651514
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dobel language | Statement: [Aru Islands, hasLanguage, Dobel language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dobel language Context triple: [Aru Islands, hasLanguage, Dobel language]
-
A.
Dobel language
chosen
The Dobel language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Aru Islands community in eastern Indonesia.
-
B.
Duoxu language
The Duoxu language is an endangered Qiangic language of the Sino-Tibetan family once spoken by a small ethnic community in Sichuan, China.
-
C.
Dobbi language
The Dobbi language is an Ethiopian Semitic language spoken by the Gurage people as part of the broader Gurage language group.
-
D.
Godoberi language
The Godoberi language is a Northeast Caucasian (Nakh-Daghestanian) language spoken by the Godoberi people in the Republic of Dagestan, Russia.
-
E.
Tawbuid language
The Tawbuid language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Tawbuid (Batangan) Mangyan people of Mindoro in the Philippines, closely related to other South Mangyan languages.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83e9d0e081908bdb71097201a06c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ccda05406081909893bec3a092d3ce |
completed | April 1, 2026, 8:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0660839f88190afdfb8bc2d710fc3 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 1:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:27 p.m.