Triple

T9202902
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tallapoosa County E220890 entity
Predicate hasBorderWith P224 FINISHED
Object Elmore County E160028 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Elmore County | Statement: [Tallapoosa County, hasBorderWith, Elmore County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Elmore County
Context triple: [Tallapoosa County, hasBorderWith, Elmore County]
  • A. Elmore County chosen
    Elmore County is a county in central Alabama known for its mix of suburban communities, rural areas, and proximity to the Montgomery metropolitan region.
  • B. Elmore County
    Elmore County is a largely rural county in Idaho known for its agricultural lands, mountain landscapes, and the presence of Mountain Home Air Force Base.
  • C. Wheeler County
    Wheeler County is a rural county in central Georgia known for its small population, agricultural landscape, and location along the Oconee River.
  • D. Wheeler County
    Wheeler County is a rural county in the eastern Texas Panhandle known for its ranching, agriculture, and small-town communities.
  • E. Blaine County
    Blaine County is a rural county in northwestern Oklahoma known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83e8e9248190862cf3e41693b310 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ccd944e6208190adfcc7f75197387d completed April 1, 2026, 8:37 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d152586ca08190854463dfdd1f727c completed April 4, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:26 p.m.