Triple

T9111397
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Potiphar's wife E218607 entity
Predicate associatedWithVirtueByContrast P48459 FINISHED
Object Joseph's chastity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Joseph's chastity | Statement: [Potiphar's wife, associatedWithVirtueByContrast, Joseph's chastity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithVirtueByContrast
Context triple: [Potiphar's wife, associatedWithVirtueByContrast, Joseph's chastity]
  • A. vowedVirtue
    Indicates that an entity has formally promised or committed to uphold a particular virtue or moral quality.
  • B. moralAssociation chosen
    Indicates a perceived ethical or moral connection between entities, such as one influencing or reflecting the moral character, values, or judgment of the other.
  • C. virtue
    Indicates that an entity possesses or exemplifies a morally good quality, trait, or behavior.
  • D. viewsAsVirtue
    Indicates that one entity regards a particular trait, behavior, or quality as a moral virtue.
  • E. virtueIllustrated
    Indicates that an action, example, or situation serves to demonstrate or make clear a particular virtue.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83dc94ac8190b9ef42684d36ff39 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cca8495c448190b9bb3803fb2dda70 completed April 1, 2026, 5:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc65fe5be081909d4470d6317b14a6 completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:16 p.m.