Triple
T9075824
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bexleyheath Line |
E217480
|
entity |
| Predicate | connects |
P390
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Welling |
E237407
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Welling | Statement: [Bexleyheath Line, connects, Welling]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Welling Context triple: [Bexleyheath Line, connects, Welling]
-
A.
Welling
chosen
Welling is a suburban town in the London Borough of Bexley, southeast London, known for its residential character and local high street.
-
B.
Welling
Welling is a small rural community located within Cardston County in southern Alberta, Canada.
-
C.
Holwell
Holwell is a small rural village located within the North Hertfordshire district of Hertfordshire, England.
-
D.
Welwyn
Welwyn is a historic village and civil parish in Hertfordshire, England, known for its Roman heritage and picturesque rural character.
-
E.
Shepway
Shepway was a former local government district in Kent, England, encompassing coastal towns such as Folkestone and Hythe.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83d6c14c8190bc056d927f00a2a2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc95c53274819099b3b3047bfe8cc8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cffe0fade4819093e4d1d91aca1d3f |
completed | April 3, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:12 p.m.