Triple

T9068647
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ISWC E217306 entity
Predicate uniqueFor P9321 FINISHED
Object each distinct musical work LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: each distinct musical work | Statement: [ISWC, uniqueFor, each distinct musical work]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: uniqueFor
Context triple: [ISWC, uniqueFor, each distinct musical work]
  • A. isUniqueTo
    Indicates that a property, characteristic, or association belongs exclusively to a particular entity and is not shared with any other.
  • B. uniquenessCondition
    Indicates that a specified element, value, or combination of attributes must be unique within a given set, context, or domain, with no duplicates allowed.
  • C. typeOfUniqueness
    Indicates that one entity’s uniqueness is characterized, classified, or constrained by the specific kind or mode of uniqueness associated with another entity.
  • D. uniqueClaim
    Indicates that a claim is distinct and not duplicated or shared with any other claim in the given context.
  • E. isUniqueWithinStandard chosen
    Indicates that an entity is the only one of its kind within the scope or constraints of a given standard or specification.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83d5a7f48190b16c1e59bd43ede0 completed March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc955ba250819085fa49e0059d06c1 completed April 1, 2026, 3:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc65f881248190bfd220bb28a9fb5f completed April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:11 p.m.