Triple

T906810
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Orawa E19565 entity
Predicate hasTraditionalCraft P5963 FINISHED
Object woodcarving LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: woodcarving | Statement: [Orawa, hasTraditionalCraft, woodcarving]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalCraft
Context triple: [Orawa, hasTraditionalCraft, woodcarving]
  • A. traditionalCraft chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or practices a craft or skill that is rooted in long-established, culturally transmitted traditions.
  • B. hasTraditionIn
    Indicates that a particular tradition, custom, or longstanding practice is present, observed, or established within a specified place, group, or context.
  • C. sharesDesignTraditionWith
    Indicates that two entities originate from or participate in the same design tradition, sharing common stylistic principles, methods, or heritage.
  • D. hasTraditionalSymbol
    Indicates that something is associated with or represented by a conventional or culturally established symbol.
  • E. traditionallyOneOf
    Indicates that something is customarily or historically considered to belong to a specific set, category, or group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4939e889c8190ac148b3ac1a7f90b completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b3bcad2481908b83575b2fb80d14 completed March 1, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b28ff5948190982c4439eadf9d87 completed March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.