Triple
T9065866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People's Courts (AANES) |
E217243
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAlternativeDisputeMechanism |
P6659
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conciliation committees |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conciliation committees | Statement: [People's Courts (AANES), hasAlternativeDisputeMechanism, conciliation committees]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlternativeDisputeMechanism Context triple: [People's Courts (AANES), hasAlternativeDisputeMechanism, conciliation committees]
-
A.
arbitrationMethod
Indicates the method or procedure used to conduct arbitration between parties in a dispute.
-
B.
methodOfDisputeResolution
chosen
Indicates the process or mechanism used to settle a disagreement or conflict between parties.
-
C.
hasDisputeResolutionBody
Indicates that there exists a designated body or authority responsible for resolving disputes related to the associated entity or relationship.
-
D.
disputeSettlementArm
Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as the division, branch, or mechanism responsible for handling, managing, or resolving disputes or conflicts for another entity.
-
E.
hasAlternativeProofMethod
Indicates that there exists a different proof technique or approach that can be used to establish the same result or theorem.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83d5a7f48190b16c1e59bd43ede0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc94bc91d48190acf62afa90eec079 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc65f881248190bfd220bb28a9fb5f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:11 p.m.