Triple
T9059348
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Circle Tour |
E217081
|
entity |
| Predicate | setlistIncludes |
P33226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | I'll Be There for You |
E325164
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: I'll Be There for You | Statement: [The Circle Tour, setlistIncludes, I'll Be There for You]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: I'll Be There for You Context triple: [The Circle Tour, setlistIncludes, I'll Be There for You]
-
A.
I'll Be There for You
chosen
"I'll Be There for You" is a 1994 pop rock song by The Rembrandts that became widely known as the signature theme song of the television sitcom Friends.
-
B.
I'll Be There
"I'll Be There" is a soulful 1970 ballad by The Jackson 5 that became one of their signature hits and a defining Motown classic.
-
C.
I’ll Be There
"I’ll Be There" is a soulful track performed by Cissy Houston, featured on her self-titled album.
-
D.
I Will Be There
"I Will Be There" is a pop ballad by Britney Spears from her debut album ...Baby One More Time.
-
E.
Say You'll Be There
"Say You'll Be There" is a 1996 pop song by the Spice Girls, known for its catchy melody, girl-power lyrics, and iconic desert-themed music video.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83d4425481909a319dab847724ec |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:08 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc7ec924f481908ca2eac98c68a41d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d0178be518819080bd6c8cf0a737e8 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 7:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:10 p.m.