Triple
T9028006
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Developer Transition Kit for Apple silicon |
E216094
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesPorts |
P65472
|
FINISHED |
| Object | USB-C |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: USB-C | Statement: [Developer Transition Kit for Apple silicon, includesPorts, USB-C]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesPorts Context triple: [Developer Transition Kit for Apple silicon, includesPorts, USB-C]
-
A.
includesPort
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has as part of it a specific port or set of ports.
-
B.
hasPorts
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or provides access points (ports) for connection, communication, or interface with other entities or systems.
-
C.
isInlandPort
Indicates that a port facility is located inland, away from the open sea, typically on a river, canal, or lake, while still serving maritime or shipping functions.
-
D.
includedWith
Indicates that one entity is provided or packaged together as part of another entity.
-
E.
containsPortionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or holds a part, segment, or fraction of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a5fa88819088144801b4dd7245 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6a7fcb308190af90d6be8700e498 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ee132f08190940749c7c522e4c1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:07 p.m.