Triple
T9025465
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wolfgang Osthoff |
E216036
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Osthoff |
E216036
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Osthoff | Statement: [Wolfgang Osthoff, familyName, Osthoff]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Osthoff Context triple: [Wolfgang Osthoff, familyName, Osthoff]
-
A.
Osthoff
chosen
Osthoff is a German-language surname borne by various individuals, including those of notable public and historical prominence.
-
B.
Hohberg
Hohberg is a municipality in the Ortenau district of Baden-Württemberg in southwestern Germany.
-
C.
Braunshardt
Braunshardt is a district of the town of Weiterstadt in the state of Hesse, Germany.
-
D.
Osterburg
Osterburg is a small town in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt, known for its historic architecture and rural surroundings.
-
E.
Horst
Horst is the taxpayer involved as the respondent in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court tax case Helvering v. Horst, which helped define the assignment-of-income doctrine.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a5fa88819088144801b4dd7245 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6a7ce71c81908041814dc9ec1713 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:44 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d017643df48190abdb672a3f85aef3 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 7:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:07 p.m.