Triple

T9010948
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 4741 E215469 entity
Predicate obsoletedBy P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 6241 E39001 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 6241 | Statement: [RFC 4741, obsoletedBy, RFC 6241]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 6241
Context triple: [RFC 4741, obsoletedBy, RFC 6241]
  • A. RFC 6241 chosen
    RFC 6241 is the IETF standard that specifies the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) for managing and configuring network devices.
  • B. RFC 7541
    RFC 7541 is the IETF specification that defines the HPACK header compression format used by HTTP/2 to efficiently encode HTTP header fields.
  • C. RFC 5741
    RFC 5741 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that defines the structure, responsibilities, and processes governing the IETF document publication streams.
  • D. RFC 6410
    RFC 6410 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that streamlines and updates the process for advancing technical specifications to Internet Standard status within the Internet Standards Process.
  • E. RFC 6347
    RFC 6347 is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard that specifies Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS), a protocol providing TLS-like security over datagram-based transports such as UDP.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83a2bf088190986ee7a8eb90407d completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc69c1571881908d0b144786b5ee1f completed April 1, 2026, 12:41 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cfdb9dca848190952427bb5712081f completed April 3, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:06 p.m.