Triple
T9010300
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dietingen |
E215450
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMunicipalCodeParent |
P85321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 08425027 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 08425027 | Statement: [Dietingen, hasMunicipalCodeParent, 08425027]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMunicipalCodeParent Context triple: [Dietingen, hasMunicipalCodeParent, 08425027]
-
A.
hasMunicipalityCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific official municipality code used for administrative or identification purposes.
-
B.
hasParentCode
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a parent code from which it is derived or to which it is hierarchically linked.
-
C.
hasMunicipalPart
Indicates that an administrative or territorial entity includes a municipality as one of its constituent parts.
-
D.
hasMunicipalDistrictNumber
Indicates that a municipality or local administrative unit is assigned a specific district number within its municipal structure.
-
E.
hasMunicipalDistrict
Indicates that an administrative entity includes or is divided into one or more municipal districts as its subordinate units.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83a2bf088190986ee7a8eb90407d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc69c00ae8819090786385a72e8baf |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5edf84408190aa5f57cb8bfd00e1 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 7:06 p.m.