Triple

T8942763
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rauma E212942 entity
Predicate hasPort P35 FINISHED
Object Port of Rauma E597812 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Port of Rauma | Statement: [Rauma, hasPort, Port of Rauma]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Port of Rauma
Context triple: [Rauma, hasPort, Port of Rauma]
  • A. Port of Rauma chosen
    The Port of Rauma is a key Finnish seaport on the country’s west coast, serving as an important hub for international cargo traffic and maritime trade.
  • B. Port of Kemi
    The Port of Kemi is a Finnish seaport on the northern Gulf of Bothnia that serves as an important hub for regional industry and cargo traffic in Lapland.
  • C. Port of Pori
    The Port of Pori is a significant Finnish seaport on the west coast that serves as an important hub for the country’s maritime trade and cargo traffic.
  • D. Port of Oulu
    The Port of Oulu is a key Finnish seaport on the Gulf of Bothnia that serves as an important hub for regional cargo traffic and industry.
  • E. Port of Mariehamn
    The Port of Mariehamn is the main maritime gateway of Åland’s capital, serving as a key passenger and cargo hub in the Baltic Sea.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839694c88190b324ffeb43d23b08 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc66d93978819084b1a5c7c5dd2372 completed April 1, 2026, 12:29 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cfc1f418708190b1272209f61e3a51 completed April 3, 2026, 1:34 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:58 p.m.