Triple

T8924365
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Titus Labienus E212502 entity
Predicate roleInCaesarsCivilWar P48696 FINISHED
Object leading commander for Pompeian faction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: leading commander for Pompeian faction | Statement: [Titus Labienus, roleInCaesarsCivilWar, leading commander for Pompeian faction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInCaesarsCivilWar
Context triple: [Titus Labienus, roleInCaesarsCivilWar, leading commander for Pompeian faction]
  • A. roleInGallicWars
    Indicates the role or involvement an entity had in the events or campaigns of the Gallic Wars.
  • B. RomanCommander chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity holds the role or position of a commander within a Roman military or organizational context.
  • C. RomanRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official representative or agent of the Roman state, authority, or interests in relation to another entity.
  • D. roleInRome
    Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within the context of Rome or Roman society.
  • E. wasHegemonOf
    Indicates that one entity held dominant political, military, or economic leadership over another entity or group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca839481d48190b42b037e0d0f636c completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc66547de881909ea9bfd104b32893 completed April 1, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a completed March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:57 p.m.