Triple
T8920504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Drayton |
E212401
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeChangeDetail |
P12888
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Transferred from Berkshire to Oxfordshire in 1974 local government reorganisation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Transferred from Berkshire to Oxfordshire in 1974 local government reorganisation | Statement: [Drayton, administrativeChangeDetail, Transferred from Berkshire to Oxfordshire in 1974 local government reorganisation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: administrativeChangeDetail Context triple: [Drayton, administrativeChangeDetail, Transferred from Berkshire to Oxfordshire in 1974 local government reorganisation]
-
A.
governanceChange
Indicates a change in the structure, rules, or authority of how an entity, organization, or system is governed.
-
B.
amendedBy
Indicates that one entity has been modified, revised, or updated as a result of changes made by another entity.
-
C.
reasonForChange
Indicates that one entity serves as the cause, justification, or motivation for a modification or change in another entity or state.
-
D.
changedOn
Indicates that an entity underwent a modification or update at a specific point in time.
-
E.
administrativeHistory
chosen
Indicates the sequence of past administrative changes, statuses, or governing arrangements that have affected an entity over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca839481d48190b42b037e0d0f636c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc664f099c8190be6d20a4574212ca |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5ed0ef3c81908cc69eac852ee12a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m.