Triple
T891149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Loving v. Virginia |
E19239
|
entity |
| Predicate | criminalChargeInOriginatingCase |
P7957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | violation of Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: violation of Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage | Statement: [Loving v. Virginia, criminalChargeInOriginatingCase, violation of Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criminalChargeInOriginatingCase Context triple: [Loving v. Virginia, criminalChargeInOriginatingCase, violation of Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage]
-
A.
committedCrime
Indicates that an entity has carried out or been responsible for a criminal act or offense.
-
B.
subjectOfProsecution
Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
-
C.
criminalStatus
Indicates the legal condition of an entity with respect to criminal law, such as whether they are accused, convicted, or cleared of a crime.
-
D.
crimeType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of the crime associated with an event or entity.
-
E.
originatingJurisdiction
Indicates the jurisdiction (such as a country, state, or legal authority) from which something originally comes or under whose laws it was first established.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4939d37188190848be3d426ebc9ae |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ad019e448190ab991e85dc6d7708 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa9372e88190b5a9db4afdc045c6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.