Triple

T8897908
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Matter of Britain E211850 entity
Predicate hasKeyMotif P41002 FINISHED
Object sword in the stone LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sword in the stone | Statement: [Matter of Britain, hasKeyMotif, sword in the stone]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyMotif
Context triple: [Matter of Britain, hasKeyMotif, sword in the stone]
  • A. hasKeyWork
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or central work (such as a main publication, artwork, or project) that is especially representative or important.
  • B. featuresMotif chosen
    Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
  • C. usesMotifsFrom
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
  • D. hasTitleMotif
    Indicates that a work’s title prominently features or reflects a recurring motif or central thematic element within the work.
  • E. hasKeyFigure
    Indicates that an entity includes, involves, or is characterized by an important or central person relevant to it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83918d3081909b326fa3750cb8c8 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc6424a8c08190aef2aa2079dd85f1 completed April 1, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c2bfb38819083d5eb1af8ccf4d6 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:54 p.m.