Triple
T8896836
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 |
E211824
|
entity |
| Predicate | newRatio |
P79535
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 18:1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 18:1 | Statement: [Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, newRatio, 18:1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: newRatio Context triple: [Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, newRatio, 18:1]
-
A.
revaluationRatio
chosen
Indicates the proportional change in value between two states or times, typically expressing how much something has been revalued relative to its previous value.
-
B.
النسب
Indicates a genealogical or familial relationship linking one entity to another through lineage or descent.
-
C.
proportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so changes in one are directly reflected by proportional changes in the other.
-
D.
isProportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so when one changes, the other changes by a fixed multiplicative factor.
-
E.
hasProportion
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified ratio, fraction, or relative share to another entity or whole.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83918d3081909b326fa3750cb8c8 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6424a8c08190aef2aa2079dd85f1 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c2bfb38819083d5eb1af8ccf4d6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:54 p.m.