Triple
T8890934
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | My Love Is Like...Wo |
E211665
|
entity |
| Predicate | musicVideoFocus |
P3289
|
FINISHED |
| Object | dance performance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dance performance | Statement: [My Love Is Like...Wo, musicVideoFocus, dance performance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicVideoFocus Context triple: [My Love Is Like...Wo, musicVideoFocus, dance performance]
-
A.
musicVideoFor
Indicates that one entity is a music video created to accompany, represent, or promote another entity, typically a song or musical work.
-
B.
musicVideoFeatures
chosen
Indicates that a music video includes or prominently showcases a particular person, group, or element.
-
C.
musicVideoProject
Indicates a relationship where an entity is involved in, associated with, or serves as a project for creating or producing a music video.
-
D.
musicVideoDirector
Indicates that one entity is the director responsible for creating or overseeing the production of the other entity, which is a music video.
-
E.
musicVideoCameo
Indicates that one entity makes a brief or special-appearance role in the other entity’s music video.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83907954819096d52a245b635841 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc619188508190aacda410f0b4c98d |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c2aec04819093c932fe51c0f08d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:53 p.m.