Triple
T8886355
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Φίληβος |
E211540
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCharacter |
P2308
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Philebus |
E38115
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Philebus | Statement: [Φίληβος, hasCharacter, Philebus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Philebus Context triple: [Φίληβος, hasCharacter, Philebus]
-
A.
Philebus
chosen
Philebus is one of Plato’s later philosophical dialogues, chiefly concerned with examining the nature of pleasure, knowledge, and the good life.
-
B.
Hippias Minor
Hippias Minor is a Socratic dialogue traditionally attributed to Plato, in which Socrates debates the nature of lying and whether the voluntary wrongdoer is better than the involuntary one.
-
C.
Hippias Major
Hippias Major is a Platonic dialogue in which Socrates and the sophist Hippias attempt, and repeatedly fail, to define the nature of beauty.
-
D.
Epinomis
Epinomis is an ancient philosophical dialogue traditionally attributed to Plato or his associate Philip of Opus, often regarded as a supplement to Plato’s Laws and focused on the role of astronomy and divine wisdom in the ideal state.
-
E.
Phaedo
Phaedo is a Platonic dialogue that recounts the final hours and philosophical discussions of Socrates before his execution.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838f9e20819096ab1f236a70381a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc618bd30881909e54d0708f144786 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfc92c2f088190b953de2bfcbb5bb5 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:53 p.m.