Triple
T8885312
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Barfée |
E211513
|
entity |
| Predicate | hairDescription |
P16252
|
FINISHED |
| Object | often depicted with messy hair |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often depicted with messy hair | Statement: [William Barfée, hairDescription, often depicted with messy hair]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hairDescription Context triple: [William Barfée, hairDescription, often depicted with messy hair]
-
A.
hairDetail
chosen
Indicates a relationship that specifies particular characteristics or attributes of an entity’s hair, such as style, color, length, or texture.
-
B.
hairAsSymbol
Indicates that hair functions as a symbolic element representing ideas, traits, or meanings beyond its literal physical presence.
-
C.
depictsHairColor
Indicates that one entity visually represents or portrays the hair color of another entity.
-
D.
tailpieceType
Indicates the specific kind or design of tailpiece associated with an instrument or object.
-
E.
headColor
Indicates the color attribute specifically associated with the head of an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838f9e20819096ab1f236a70381a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc616cf8c48190a27b381e48f23377 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c2aec04819093c932fe51c0f08d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:53 p.m.