Triple
T8863751
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C. Melvin Sharpe |
E210958
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bolling v. Sharpe |
E10748
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bolling v. Sharpe | Statement: [C. Melvin Sharpe, notableWork, Bolling v. Sharpe]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bolling v. Sharpe Context triple: [C. Melvin Sharpe, notableWork, Bolling v. Sharpe]
-
A.
Bolling v. Sharpe
chosen
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
B.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
E.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838bbddc8190ab546d737e5d350f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc610416b48190a26f0c457089ffca |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfab9764388190a57ca0c0bb890523 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:50 p.m.