Triple
T8852467
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 2821 |
E210669
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletedBy |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 5321 |
E34940
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 5321 | Statement: [RFC 2821, obsoletedBy, RFC 5321]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 5321 Context triple: [RFC 2821, obsoletedBy, RFC 5321]
-
A.
RFC 5321
chosen
RFC 5321 is the Internet standard that specifies the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) used for email transmission across IP networks.
-
B.
RFC 2821
RFC 2821 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for email transmission before being superseded by RFC 5321.
-
C.
RFC 821
RFC 821 is the original Internet standard that formally defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for electronic mail transmission.
-
D.
RFC 822
RFC 822 is an early Internet standard that defines the format of text-based email messages, including headers and addressing conventions.
-
E.
RFC 5322
RFC 5322 is the Internet standard that defines the syntax and format of text-based email messages, including headers such as From, To, Subject, and Date.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838a424c8190b1ecac115c2927e7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60c3c5548190926e374bbe592180 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfa08c3f0081909a9aad5599f7deb2 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:12 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:49 p.m.