Triple

T8800962
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Will Hunting E209403 entity
Predicate hasLegalIssues P4511 FINISHED
Object history of assault charges LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: history of assault charges | Statement: [Will Hunting, hasLegalIssues, history of assault charges]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalIssues
Context triple: [Will Hunting, hasLegalIssues, history of assault charges]
  • A. hasLegalIssue chosen
    Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
  • B. hasLegalProceeding
    Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
  • C. hasLegalStatus
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
  • D. legalMatters
    Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
  • E. hasLegalRight
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca836320e48190b5cf585b90a322c4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5fb8aab88190befed16301e08efc completed March 31, 2026, 11:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c1f28ec8190a34311cb412920c2 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:44 p.m.