Triple
T8794701
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | local government of the Netherlands |
E209258
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTaxingPower |
P79121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | property-related local taxes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: property-related local taxes | Statement: [local government of the Netherlands, hasTaxingPower, property-related local taxes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTaxingPower Context triple: [local government of the Netherlands, hasTaxingPower, property-related local taxes]
-
A.
hasRegulatoryPower
Indicates that one entity possesses formal authority to create, enforce, or oversee rules and regulations governing another entity or activity.
-
B.
hasSovereignPowerOver
Indicates that one entity holds ultimate governing authority or supreme ruling power over another entity.
-
C.
haveFiscalPowers
Indicates that an entity possesses legal authority or control over financial or budgetary matters.
-
D.
taxingJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates the authority or region that has the legal power to impose and collect taxes on a given entity or transaction.
-
E.
hasTaxPolicyResponsibility
Indicates that an entity holds authority or duty for creating, managing, or overseeing tax-related policies for another entity or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca836240888190a62b262e56a69d2f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5fa0c6008190a5c4d87510ad5bbd |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c1d48f08190b325a77d4c76d223 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:43 p.m.