Triple

T87937
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tituba E1767 entity
Predicate confessedTo P4081 FINISHED
Object practicing witchcraft LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: practicing witchcraft | Statement: [Tituba, confessedTo, practicing witchcraft]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confessedTo
Context triple: [Tituba, confessedTo, practicing witchcraft]
  • A. usesConfession
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a confession (typically an admission of guilt or wrongdoing) as part of its actions or reasoning toward another entity or outcome.
  • B. firstAccused
    Indicates that the subject is the primary or earliest individual formally charged or blamed in a particular case or incident.
  • C. prosecuted
    Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
  • D. confirmedBy
    Indicates that one entity validates, approves, or verifies the truth, accuracy, or occurrence of another entity or event.
  • E. concluded
    Indicates that an entity has brought an event, process, discussion, or agreement to an end, often after reaching a decision or final judgment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24c8150408190910a693eb51c1f71 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2503d304c8190a0034ffa4a38a501 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24eb6da2c8190a33d144d219f7abe completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2503c12808190a3cbb7b171f466f0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.