Triple

T8778193
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Curtis Craig E208651 entity
Predicate partyTo P1790 FINISHED
Object Craig v. Boren E14413 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Craig v. Boren | Statement: [Curtis Craig, partyTo, Craig v. Boren]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Craig v. Boren
Context triple: [Curtis Craig, partyTo, Craig v. Boren]
  • A. Craig v. Boren chosen
    Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • C. Stone v. Mississippi
    Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
  • D. Powell v. Alabama
    Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
  • E. Edwards v. South Carolina
    Edwards v. South Carolina is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned the breach-of-the-peace convictions of civil rights demonstrators, affirming their First Amendment rights to peaceful protest and assembly.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835fbee88190bf625939bac48d7f completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5f51b3d48190b542a0423d3938e0 completed March 31, 2026, 11:57 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cf51d69af481909245ca327f36e9c2 completed April 3, 2026, 5:36 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:42 p.m.