Triple
T8775918
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | It Can Happen |
E208581
|
entity |
| Predicate | follows |
P134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hold On |
unclear NED1
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hold On | Statement: [It Can Happen, follows, Hold On]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hold On Context triple: [It Can Happen, follows, Hold On]
-
A.
Hold On
"Hold On" is a song featured on the album "Warning" by the American punk rock band Green Day.
-
B.
Hold On
"Hold On" is a track by American rapper Pusha T from his critically acclaimed debut studio album "My Name Is My Name."
-
C.
Hold On
"Hold On" is a song featured on the album "Boys & Girls."
-
D.
Hold On
"Hold On" is a critically acclaimed blues-rock song by American band Alabama Shakes, known for Brittany Howard's powerful vocals and its role in bringing the band widespread recognition.
-
E.
Hold On
"Hold On" is an emotional rock ballad by Good Charlotte that addresses themes of depression and suicide, encouraging listeners to persevere through hardship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide. chosen
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835fbee88190bf625939bac48d7f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5f30428881909de72c08972224f0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:56 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf51ceee2c81908d521cc4931e25dd |
completed | April 3, 2026, 5:36 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:41 p.m.