Triple
T8757366
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Magic Valley |
E208103
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounty |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gooding County |
E761705
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gooding County | Statement: [Magic Valley, hasCounty, Gooding County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gooding County Context triple: [Magic Valley, hasCounty, Gooding County]
-
A.
Gooding County
chosen
Gooding County is a rural county in Idaho known for its agricultural economy, small communities, and location along the Snake River Plain.
-
B.
Toombs County
Toombs County is a rural county in southeastern Georgia known for its agriculture, particularly Vidalia onions, and its county seat, Lyons.
-
C.
Gilchrist County
Gilchrist County is a rural county in northern Florida known for its small-town communities and natural springs along the Suwannee and Santa Fe rivers.
-
D.
Bailey County
Bailey County is a rural county in the western Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small communities.
-
E.
Jones County
Jones County is a rural county in the U.S. state of Texas, known for its agricultural economy and small communities near the Abilene region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835cd6b08190bd7c63db92f53c86 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5ddabdc88190ba50ef1833a815d0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfa033e1b4819083521484f46078a1 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:40 p.m.