Triple

T8724005
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brooks Hatlen E207083 entity
Predicate famousLineContext P77440 FINISHED
Object "Brooks was here" inscription LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: "Brooks was here" inscription | Statement: [Brooks Hatlen, famousLineContext, "Brooks was here" inscription]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: famousLineContext
Context triple: [Brooks Hatlen, famousLineContext, "Brooks was here" inscription]
  • A. dialogueLine chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific spoken or written line of dialogue expressed by another entity (such as a character or speaker).
  • B. famousCall
    Indicates that one entity makes a phone call to another entity who is widely known or celebrated.
  • C. associatedWithFamousSlogan
    Indicates that an entity is connected to, known for, or commonly linked with a particular famous slogan.
  • D. famousCallBy
    Indicates that one entity is famously referred to or called by a particular name or title by another entity or source.
  • E. characterCatchphrase
    Indicates that a particular phrase is commonly and distinctively used by a character as their catchphrase.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835811d8819081ea00fd2a2c9a1c completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5d0791208190b043332247372d7b completed March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc457093188190959287a6458651c6 completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:36 p.m.