Triple

T8718935
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Code of Canon Law (1983) E206962 entity
Predicate subjectToRevision P48027 FINISHED
Object subsequent motu proprios and legislative acts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subsequent motu proprios and legislative acts | Statement: [Code of Canon Law (1983), subjectToRevision, subsequent motu proprios and legislative acts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectToRevision
Context triple: [Code of Canon Law (1983), subjectToRevision, subsequent motu proprios and legislative acts]
  • A. revisionOf
    Indicates that one entity is a modified or updated version of another earlier entity.
  • B. subjectToReformBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity is undergoing or designated for changes, improvements, or restructuring carried out by another entity.
  • C. revisionMechanism
    Indicates the method or process by which something is updated, corrected, or modified over time.
  • D. significantRevisionIn
    Indicates that one entity represents a substantial or important change made within another entity, such as a major update or revision occurring in a larger work or version.
  • E. revisionKnownAs
    Indicates that a particular revision of an entity is referred to or identified by a specific alternative name or label.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83572d4881909bef3be2b578d539 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5d014e208190a4c6055901580d0c completed March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc456e806c819087e7d66ee737f242 completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:36 p.m.