Triple

T869699
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject the Muses E18781 entity
Predicate conceptualDescendantOf P909 FINISHED
Object earlier local nymph cults LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earlier local nymph cults | Statement: [the Muses, conceptualDescendantOf, earlier local nymph cults]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conceptualDescendantOf
Context triple: [the Muses, conceptualDescendantOf, earlier local nymph cults]
  • A. ancestorDescribedAs
    Indicates that an ancestor is characterized or referred to using a particular description, label, or portrayal.
  • B. subclassOf
    Indicates that one class is a more specific type of another class, inheriting its characteristics as a subset of it.
  • C. derivedFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity originates, is obtained, or is developed from another source entity.
  • D. generalizationOf
    Indicates that one entity represents a broader, more general concept or category that subsumes or abstracts over another, more specific entity.
  • E. inheritedFrom
    Indicates that one entity has received or derived something (such as traits, rights, or property) from another entity, typically a predecessor or ancestor.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4938ce8688190a24bdfef82ba7d21 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac811e548190a72b7a10b5ea8665 completed March 1, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa89ca008190b50d061ac7fe19f9 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.