Triple
T8692838
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 5011 |
E206332
|
entity |
| Predicate | updatesMechanismOf |
P18276
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DNSSEC trust anchor configuration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DNSSEC trust anchor configuration | Statement: [RFC 5011, updatesMechanismOf, DNSSEC trust anchor configuration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: updatesMechanismOf Context triple: [RFC 5011, updatesMechanismOf, DNSSEC trust anchor configuration]
-
A.
revisionMechanism
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which something is updated, corrected, or modified over time.
-
B.
replacedOrComplementedMechanism
Indicates that one mechanism has been superseded by, or now functions alongside as a complement to, another mechanism.
-
C.
amendmentMechanism
Indicates the process or rules by which an agreement, document, or system can be formally changed or updated.
-
D.
mentionsMechanism
Indicates that one entity explicitly refers to or describes the mechanism, process, or causal pathway by which another entity operates or produces an effect.
-
E.
stateMutationMechanism
Indicates the process or method by which a system’s state is changed from one condition to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835481fc819084e33d3bc883bfa6 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5825385081908dee42cba8e98392 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc4569f9048190b9c86b4c81103d35 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:33 p.m.