Triple
T8676591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gaspard de la nuit |
E205929
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedComposerStyle |
P53017
|
FINISHED |
| Object | French impressionism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French impressionism | Statement: [Gaspard de la nuit, associatedComposerStyle, French impressionism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedComposerStyle Context triple: [Gaspard de la nuit, associatedComposerStyle, French impressionism]
-
A.
composerStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a composer and the other represents the musical style or genre characteristic of that composer's work.
-
B.
associatedWithComposerRole
Indicates that an entity is connected to another entity specifically in the capacity or role of a composer.
-
C.
compositionStyle
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach in which something is composed, such as its structural, aesthetic, or stylistic conventions.
-
D.
composer
Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a musical work associated with another entity.
-
E.
compatibleStylus
Indicates that one object can function properly as a stylus with another device or surface.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83529a9c8190b5c075b4f14636ed |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc4ae6d19c8190be003f7901c0468d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc4567b5c881908d9ec5dcfc783fac |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:32 p.m.