Triple

T8659
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society E172 entity
Predicate hasContentType P640 FINISHED
Object research article LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: research article | Statement: [Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, hasContentType, research article]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContentType
Context triple: [Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, hasContentType, research article]
  • A. hasCollectionType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or organized under a specific type or category of collection.
  • B. hasInputType
    Indicates that an entity takes another entity as its input type for its operation, function, or process.
  • C. hasOutputType
    Indicates that an entity produces, returns, or yields a result of a specified type.
  • D. hasMemberType
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with members belonging to a specified type or category.
  • E. hasTypeOfRecipient
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or kind of recipient it is intended for or directed to.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a23bb612708190b09f25385e4b63d1 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 12:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2407916ac8190b76d2e6690efaef3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a23fe3a87881909ab95bb3a0b474ec completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a240782e108190b6b60c26b84ae179 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 12:54 a.m.