Triple
T865099
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV) |
E18683
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiesConcept |
P5130
|
FINISHED |
| Object | self-determination of peoples |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: self-determination of peoples | Statement: [General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV), clarifiesConcept, self-determination of peoples]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clarifiesConcept Context triple: [General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV), clarifiesConcept, self-determination of peoples]
-
A.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
B.
demonstratedConcept
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
-
C.
challengedConcept
Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
-
D.
aimsToExplain
chosen
Indicates that one entity intends to clarify, make understandable, or provide an explanation about another entity, concept, or situation.
-
E.
reformulatedConcept
Indicates that one concept is a revised, rephrased, or otherwise modified version of another concept while preserving its core meaning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4938ce8688190a24bdfef82ba7d21 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ac6acc148190bcc00a1e939ace77 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa86065881909d477e26fdd84d45 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.